McKesson argues trial judge’s recusal is an additional ground for appeal in Canadian transfer pricing dispute

McKesson Corp., which is appealing an adverse decision in a transfer pricing dispute in Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal, filed a motion to amend its appeal on November 3 claiming that actions taken by the trial judge in filing a lengthy “Reasons for Recusal,” gave McKesson additional grounds for appeal, writes Timothy Fitzsimmons of Dentons in a November 5 blog post.

For discussion of this development, a copy of the Amended Notice of Appeal, Supplementary Memorandum of Fact and Law, and Written Representations, see  Dentons.

Related article:

• In lengthy, angry, opinion, Canadian judge recuses himself from all remaining issues in McKesson Tax Court case